Home | Bio | Resources | Workshops | Conferences | E-zine | Teacher Idea Exchange | Links | Contact

 

E-zine

Vol. 1, No. 2

Test Scores: "Educational Enron"?

Test scores made the news again last week.  This time it was the SATs, tests that are designed to be one of the factors universities can consider in selecting students for admission.  In fact, these tests do predict, at least to a degree, how well students may do in their first year in college.  What they don't do is show how well schools are teaching their curriculum or the state standards, nor do they show the quality of teaching and learning in any given classroom.  Furthermore, in some states a high percentage of high school juniors and seniors take the SATs while in other states just the top students do.  It is fairly obvious that the number and quality of students taking the test affect the average score.  Nevertheless, SAT scores, like many other test scores, are used as the basis for comparison and judgment of how well schools are teaching and what students are learning.  

Georgia, the state where I live, has the dubious distinction of having the lowest average SAT scores of all the 50 states.  Even though a large percentage of Georgia's high school juniors and seniors take the test (thus the expectation should be that the average scores will be lower) it's not hard to imagine that the politicians and the media here are having a field day with these latest statistics!  Much has been written about how horrible Georgia's education system is, and each interest group has someone different to blame for the low test scores.  Meanwhile, the newspapers have printed the scores for each high school and real estate agents are advertising housing in the higher scoring school zones.  You could probably guess that the higher scoring schools are in relatively affluent areas with educated parents.

The above is just the most recent example of the over-emphasis on test scores in American education.  Yes, test scores are one important indicator of how well and how much students are learning.  But they should not be the only assessment and should not be the only educational bottom line!  As I work with teachers and administrators throughout the United States, I hear over and over again that test scores are the only things that really count.  Legislative mandates and political pressure seem to make this so.  Unfortunately, the unintended consequence often is that many other things that are valuable to children get lost in the shuffle!  Creative and critical thinking, enjoyment of learning, social skills, leadership development, affective curriculum, reflective thinking, trial and error in problem solving, personal development, classroom celebrations and even the arts may be eliminated in the push for higher and higher test scores.

I see some interesting parallels to what has recently happened in the business world.  Corporate America has gone through a period of great difficulty in the past year.  In the thriving bull market of the late 1990s, the only thing of importance was the bottom line for the last quarter.  Top corporate CEOs and CFOs did everything in their power to make sure the bottom line looked great, even if the corporation was actually imploding and in big trouble from within.  Accounting firms and auditors knew that the only thing of importance was the current quarter's bottom line and immediate profits. Additionally, they knew the accounting tricks that could make this happen in the short term. 

Eventually all of this 'number play' caught up with Corporate America.  Many workers lost their jobs as companies went bankrupt and stock prices plummeted.  Retirement savings in various 401 K plans have shrunk so much that some of us jokingly now call them 201 K plans!  While a number of corporations have been involved in this numbers game, the best known is probably Enron.  In the title of this article, I use "Enron" symbolically to represent all of the corporations who looked to the immediate bottom line without looking at what would have been good for the company in the long term.

When I look at the over-emphasis on test scores in education, I can't help but see some similarities to this corporate collapse.  Many schools have adopted 'test prep' curricula.  Teachers are told to teach to the test and bring those scores up.  Teachers consistently tell me that if it's not on the test they don't bother to teach it.  Some gifted students (the challenging types who have already figured out how to play the 'school game') tell me they don't have to work or study in school because they can easily pass the end-of-year tests and that is the only thing that counts.  Many teachers and administrators are so stressed out and worried about test scores they find it impossible to pass on an attitude of joy in learning to the students.  Students themselves often have prolonged test anxiety that may last for weeks or months! Others feel school is just an institution for test preparation and nothing more.

Like the quarterly bottom line in a corporation, if used properly, test scores are helpful indicators.  Teachers can use them to see what a student already knows, what he/she needs to know and where he/she might need extra help.  Conversely, giving a pretest before beginning a unit of work is an excellent way to find out which students already know the material and who, therefore, can compact out of the regular curriculum and do more advanced alternate assignments.

However, many rich and challenging learning activities cannot be adequately assessed by a test.  Alternative assessments such as checklists, rubrics, conferences, learning logs and interviews with the student are often more appropriate ways to evaluate learning.  Such learning and assessments are used less and less in schools where the test scores are all that matter.

A true education should be more than twelve years of test preparation!  If the bottom line for schools becomes only test scores and nothing more, I fear the result will be students who take tests well but can do nothing more  --- what I would call "Educational Enron".  This is when the bottom line (test scores) look good but lifelong learning is minimal.   On the other hand, if test scores are only a small part of what school is about, if we use valid and reliable alternative assessments, and if we put the emphasis on creativity, inventive thinking, critical and evaluative thought, personal effort and responsibility, consideration for others and continual academic progress, our children should grow to be the educated citizens we need for the 21st century.

Coil, C. (2005). Test Scores: "Educational Enron"? E-Zine, Vol. 1, 2. www.carolyncoil.com.